Author summary
7% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alma Campos results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 711 hits . Analysis detected 2,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,546 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,437 of 6,628 authors). This Alma Campos is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Alma Campos
Author details
Total words: 8,546
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst