Author summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Linthicum results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 530 hits . Analysis detected 5,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,828 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,177 of 6,628 authors). This Kate Linthicum is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Kate Linthicum
Author details
Total words: 6,828
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst