Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Steve Fisher results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,215 authors). This Steve Fisher is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Steve Fisher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Steve Fisher (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,332
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos