Speaker summary
66% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,053.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chip Roy results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 561.88 hits . Analysis detected 6,426.895 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,053.333 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,674 of 26,780 speakers). This Chip Roy is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Chip Roy
Speaker details
Total words: 4,053.333
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score11 analyzed videos4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst