Author summary
39% 3 analyzed articles/videos 508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Grace McKinnon results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 572 hits . Analysis detected 3,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,580 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,742 of 6,316 authors). This Virginia Grace McKinnon is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Virginia Grace McKinnon
Author details
Total words: 4,580
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst