Speaker summary
57% 10 analyzed articles/videos 169.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Kemp results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 507.951 faulty-reasoning hits from 169.333 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,939 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Kemp is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group. Brian Kemp
Speaker details
Total words: 169.333
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.7% percentile 15.2% BS Score10 analyzed videos169.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 28.2% 28.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 37.4% 37.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst