Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Capitol Beat results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 412 faulty-reasoning hits from 406 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,394 authors). This Capitol Beat is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Capitol Beat
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Capitol Beat (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 406
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles406 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 34.7%34.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.8%10.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.4%9.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 7.9%7.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 34.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos