Author summary
61%1 analyzed article/video1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amelia Twyman/Georgia Recorder results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 2,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,303 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,424 of 6,628 authors). This Amelia Twyman/Georgia Recorder is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Amelia Twyman/Georgia Recorder
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
64%Amelia Twyman/Georgia Recorder (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,303
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510063.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos