Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Cohn results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 924 hits. Analysis detected 5,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,461 of 6,244 authors). This Scott Cohn is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Scott Cohn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
45%Scott Cohn (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,092
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.1%7.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos