Topic summary
â 33% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workforce Development results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 3,767 hits . Analysis detected 40,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,856 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of â 11% (13,909 of 15,584 topics). This Workforce Development is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Workforce Development
Topic details
Total words: 52,856
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score14 analyzed articles52.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst