Author summary
52%3 analyzed articles/videos6,146 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Hechinger Report results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,448 hits. Analysis detected 13,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,842 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (5,791 of 6,348 authors). This The Hechinger Report is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
The Hechinger Report
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
9%The Hechinger Report (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,842
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751008.8% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate