BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.2% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 601 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,664 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.8% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,561 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the article peer group.

Two federal immigration agents involved in the shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant in Minneapolis last month appear to have lied about the details of the incident, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security said Friday. 
The agents have been placed on administrative leave after "a joint review by ICE and the Department of Justice of video evidence has revealed that sworn testimony provided by two separate officers appears to have made untruthful statements," the spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin, said. 
The rare acknowledgment of potential missteps by ICE agents comes after the agency's acting director, Todd Lyons, told Congress on Thursday that ICE has conducted 37 investigations into officers' use of force over the past year. 
He didn't say whether anyone has been fired. 
McLaughlin said the agency is investigating the January 14 shooting of the Venezuelan immigrant, and the officers involved could be fired or criminally prosecuted for any violations. 
"The men and women of ICE are entrusted with upholding the rule of law and are held to the highest standards of professionalism, integrity, and ethical conduct," McLaughlin said in Friday's statement. 
"Violations of this sacred sworn oath will not be tolerated." 
DHS initially said the officer fired a shot to "save his life" after being "ambushed and attacked" by three immigrants with a snow shovel and a broom handle during a "targeted traffic stop." 
Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, the subject of the traffic stop, was injured after getting shot in the leg. 
Another Venezuelan man, Alfredo Aljorna, was also accused of attacking the officers. 
However, Minnesota U.S. Attorney Dan Rosen on Thursday dropped the charges against them. 
McLaughlin did not respond to questions about whether the agency stands by its initial statement describing the agent's behavior during the incident as self-defense. 
Since the beginning, eyewitness accounts contradicted the statements made by DHS related to the shooting of Sosa-Celis. 
His partner, Indriany Mendoza Camacho, told Minnesota Public Radio last week she was present the night of the shooting, and that Sosa-Celis was trying to separate the agent and the other Venezuelan man so both the immigrants could get into a house. 
"I'm a witness, I saw everything, and my partner never grabbed anything to hit him or anything like that," she said. 
The shooting happened during Operation Metro Surge, an aggressive immigration crackdown that brought about 3,000 federal agents to Minnesota starting in December. 
The Trump administration on Thursday announced it was ending Operation Metro Surge. 
The operation led to more than 4,000 arrests of undocumented immigrants, according to White House border czar Tom Homan, and the killing of two U.S. citizens, Renee Macklin Good and Alex Pretti. 
Those shootings are also being investigated by federal authorities. 
An internal preliminary review conducted by Customs and Border Protection into Pretti's death also contradicted the Trump administration's initial narrative about his shooting. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.5%Neal Morton: 1.4%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias8.5%This article: 21.3%Neal Morton: 3.1%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias21.3%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 3.2%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 1.0%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.4%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.9%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 35.2%Neal Morton: 18.1%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect35.2%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 4.1%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 6.0%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.8%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 7.0%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 1.5%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%Neal Morton: 9.6%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias22.2%This article: 11.5%Neal Morton: 2.2%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 1.0%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.4%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.3%Neal Morton: 1.4%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.6%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Neal Morton: 1.5%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 1.5%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.1%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.6%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 7.1%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 1.2%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.5%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.9%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 3.5%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.8%Neal Morton: 1.9%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.8%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.5%Neal Morton: 3.4%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal4.5%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.6%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neal Morton: 0.0%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

469 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.