Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Science results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 739 hits . Analysis detected 4,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,281 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (30,900 of 36,204 keywords). This Data Science is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Data Science
Keyword details
Total words: 7,281
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst