Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Achim Zeileis results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 1,508 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,501 of 6,244 authors). This Achim Zeileis is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Achim Zeileis
Author details
Total words: 3,484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst