Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neal Morton results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 688 hits. Analysis detected 3,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,797 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,798 of 6,360 authors). This Neal Morton is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Neal Morton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
56%Neal Morton (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,797
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.1%18.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos