Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alpine School District results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 688 hits. Analysis detected 3,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,797 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,058 of 37,536 keywords). This Alpine School District is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Alpine School District
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
50%Alpine School District (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,797
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos