Author summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Marcus results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,568 hits . Analysis detected 10,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,581 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,326 of 6,244 authors). This Jon Marcus is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Jon Marcus
Author details
Total words: 12,581
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst