Author summary
24% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meir Rinde results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,311 hits . Analysis detected 8,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,013 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,713 of 6,628 authors). This Meir Rinde is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Meir Rinde
Author details
Total words: 12,013
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst