Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruno V. Manno results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , False Dilemma , and Optimism Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,042 hits . Analysis detected 4,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,166 of 6,359 authors). This Bruno V. Manno is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Bruno V. Manno
Author details
Total words: 6,084
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 17.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst