Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 1,625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Parilla results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,028 hits . Analysis detected 6,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,163 of 6,359 authors). This Joseph Parilla is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Joseph Parilla
Author details
Total words: 6,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.0% 10.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 15.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst