Topic summary
76% 15 analyzed articles/videos 10,399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tehran results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 5,754 hits . Analysis detected 44,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,307 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,057 of 15,447 topics). This Tehran is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group. Tehran
Topic details
Total words: 44,307
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score15 analyzed articles44.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst