Iran-US war latest: Trump administration reportedly preparing for fresh round of military strikes 

By Shweta Sharma0% Alex Croft76% James C. Reynolds72%

5/23/2026, 1:00:19 AM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

Donald Trump’s administration is preparing for a fresh round of military strikes against Iran, according to a new report. 
Military and intelligence officials have canceled their Memorial Day weekend plans in case of possible strikes, sources told CBS News. 
"The President always maintains all options at all times, and it is the job of the Pentagon to be ready to execute any decision the Commander-in-Chief could make," a White House spokesperson told the outlet. 
No final decision to launch the strikes had been made as of Friday afternoon, local time. 
If the US were to launch fresh strikes, it would threaten the fragile ceasefire between Washington and Tehran. 
Peace talks seem to be getting nowhere as the war drags on for nearly three months. 
Also Friday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Nato allies need to prepare a “Plan B” to open the Strait of Hormuz. 
“What if Iran decides we refuse to open the straits, we’re going to own the straits, and we’re going to charge tolls for it?” 
he said at a meeting of Nato foreign ministers in Sweden. 
“At that point, something has to be done about it.” 
The United States has seen some progress in talks with Iran and is in constant communication with the Pakistani mediators, but there is more work to be done, Marco Rubio said today. 
“There's been some progress. 
I wouldn't exaggerate it. 
I wouldn't diminish it,” Rubio told reporters after a NATO ministers meeting in Sweden. 
“There's more work to be done,” he admitted. 
“We're not there yet. 
I hope we get there.” 
Rubio said Trump would prefer to make a good deal, but will need to discuss concerns about Iran’s possible access to nuclear weapons, the issue of future uranium enrichment, and the Strait of Hormuz. 
“We're dealing with a very difficult group of people, and if it doesn't change, then the president's been clear he has other options,” Rubio said. 
UAE presidential advisor Anwar Gargash says they assess there is a “50-50” chance that the US and Iran can strike a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. 
He also warns that any move by Iran to alter the status of the waterway would have severe global repercussions and set a dangerous precedent. 
Rubio earlier said Iran is “trying to create a tolling system” and convince Oman to join. 
“There is not a country in the world that should accept that,” he said. 
The US Navy has put a major arms sale to Taiwan on “pause” to ensure the military has enough munitions for its war in Iran. 
Hung Cao, the acting secretary of the US Navy, said during a congressional hearing about the stalled $14bn weapons purchase, that “right now we’re doing a pause in order to make sure we have the munitions we need for Epic Fury - which we have plenty”. 
“But, we're just making sure we have everything, then the foreign military sales will continue when the administration deems necessary.” 
Although Donald Trump and Marco Rubio have hinted that talks are progressing better than previously, there is still no sign of a clear deal over the Strait of Hormuz. 
A senior Iranian source said on Thursday that it remained one of the key sticking points. 
Speaking on Thursday, Trump railed against Tehran’s intentions to charge fees on ships using the Strait of Hormuz. 
“We want it open, we want it free. 
We don't want tolls,” Trump said. 
“It's an international waterway.” 
The closure of the Strait through the war has created massive disruption to a vital channel of commerce that ordinarily carries a fifth of global oil and LNG. 
Iran has floated plans to continue charging some $2m for tankers post-war. 
The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea says countries bordering straits cannot demand payment simply for permission to pass through. 
But Iran has said it aims to reopen the strait to friendly countries that abide by its terms that could potentially include fees. 
It emerged on Thursday that Iran and Oman have reportedly held discussions on enforcing a permanent toll on the Strait of Hormuz, despite Donald Trump’s warnings. 
People familiar with talks told the New York Times that Oman has come around to the idea of sharing revenues from ships crossing the Strait. 
“It would make a diplomatic deal unfeasible if they were to continue to pursue that. 
So it's a threat to the world if they were trying to do that, and it's completely illegal,” Rubio said. 
Fifa is set to prohibit fans from bringing the pre-revolutionary Iran flag into stadiums at the World Cup in the United States  a ruling also made for the last World Cup in Qatar. 
While similar in its red, white and green band formation, the pre-revolutionary Iranian flag has a lion and the sun in the middle, while the official flag, changed following the Iranian revolution in 1979, has an Islamic symbol and phrasing, depicting the shift from a monarchy to a theocratic government. 
The pre-revolutionary flag has been used by Iranians in the US and worldwide as a symbol of protest and standing against the current regime and, while prohibited at the 2022 World Cup, some fans managed to sneak the flag into stadiums in Qatar. 
Read more here: 
A proposed mission by the UK and France to secure the Strait of Hormuz is for “when no one is shooting”, US secretary of state Marco Rubio has said as he stressed the need for a “plan B” to reopen the waterway if Iran continues to threaten vessels. 
While America’s top diplomat said he hoped a deal was reached with Tehran to ensure free passage through the sea route, he stressed the need for a fallback if Iran refused to give up control of the channel and enforced tolls. 
In this scenario, “then someone’s going to have to go in and do something about it”, argued Mr Rubio. 
He was speaking at a meeting of Nato foreign ministers in Sweden, against the backdrop of the Iran conflict, which has fuelled frictions within the military alliance. 
Donald Trump has been scathing over Britain’s reluctance to be drawn into the war, accusing Sir Keir Starmer of being weak and deriding the Royal Navy. 
The Prime Minister refused to give the US free rein in its use of British military bases to carry out attacks against Iran, with permission limited to defensive strikes on missile sites. 
There have also been tensions over the response of the UK and other countries to the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz, which was open to shipping prior to the US and Israel offensive against Iran. 
Read more here. 
Donald Trump won't be attending the wedding of his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr because he has to stay in Washington for government business, he has revealed. 
Trump Jr is marrying Palm Beach socialite Bettina Anderson on a small island in the Bahamas, CNN reported. 
Trump told reporters on Thursday that Donald Trump Jr. wanted his father to attend, but that it was going to be a "small private affair." 
Trump said then he would try to make the wedding but the timing was bad for him. 
"I have a thing called Iran and other things," Trump said on Thursday. 
"While I very much wanted to be with my son, Don Jr., and the newest member of the Trump Family, his soon to be wife, Bettina, circumstances pertaining to Government, and my love for the United States of America, do not allow me to do so," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. 
"I feel it is important for me to remain in Washington, D.C., at the White House during this important period of time," the post continued. 
Donald Trump is speaking to a crowd of supporters in Suffern, New York State. 
“Everything’s gone, their leaders are gone,” he says, referring to Iran’s leaders. 
He claims Chinese president Xi Jinping, who he calls a “good man”, was full of high praise for the US military. 
The US president has moved on to other topics now, but we’ll bring you any more lines from the speech related to Iran. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Shweta Sharma: 1.9%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 5.2%Shweta Sharma: 0.2%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias5.2%This article: 1.4%Shweta Sharma: 2.4%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic1.4%This article: 3.6%Shweta Sharma: 1.0%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.3%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Shweta Sharma: 10.8%The Independent: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 0.9%Shweta Sharma: 9.7%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect0.9%This article: 1.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.4%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion1.0%This article: 1.5%Shweta Sharma: 0.5%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Shweta Sharma: 6.4%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias4.8%This article: 11.9%Shweta Sharma: 3.1%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias11.9%This article: 30.8%Shweta Sharma: 14.7%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias30.8%This article: 10.5%Shweta Sharma: 5.5%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 1.9%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.5%Shweta Sharma: 0.4%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 2.5%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 1.9%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Shweta Sharma: 1.1%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Shweta Sharma: 1.3%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Shweta Sharma: 3.5%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem1.9%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.1%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.5%Shweta Sharma: 2.9%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority12.5%This article: 13.4%Shweta Sharma: 1.6%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma13.4%This article: 3.6%Shweta Sharma: 1.4%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope3.6%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.2%Shweta Sharma: 6.6%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.7%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.3%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.7%Shweta Sharma: 7.0%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion7.7%This article: 3.9%Shweta Sharma: 1.0%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 12.3%Shweta Sharma: 2.5%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.3%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.8%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.3%Shweta Sharma: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.3%This article: 3.6%Shweta Sharma: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division3.6%This article: 6.5%Shweta Sharma: 0.6%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal6.5%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%Shweta Sharma: 1.8%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Shweta Sharma: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground2.1%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.8%Shweta Sharma: 2.5%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote5.8%This article: 6.3%Shweta Sharma: 1.3%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.3%This article: 3.9%Shweta Sharma: 11.8%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice3.9%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 1.4%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Shweta Sharma: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1372 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers56%attributed speech610writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House spokesperson • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 4 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAnwar Gargash • 28 words • 0.0% coverageAnwar Gargash • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageHung Cao • 46 words • 0.0% coverageHung Cao • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 48 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 41 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 27 words • 0.0% coverageCNN • 18 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 54 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words4.6% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+94.4 ptsWriter: 5.6%White House spokesperson: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+93.3 ptsWriter: 6.7%White House spokesperson: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%White House spokesperson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.