Keyword summary
64% 64 analyzed articles/videos 40,989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 18,239 hits . Analysis detected 169,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 200,188 analyzed words across 64 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (32,202 of 35,840 keywords). This Washington is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Washington
Keyword details
Total words: 200,188
Article count: 64
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score64 analyzed articles200.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst