Author summary
78%1 analyzed article/video1,111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunter Pauli results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 818 hits. Analysis detected 4,171 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,605 of 6,497 authors). This Hunter Pauli is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Hunter Pauli
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Hunter Pauli (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,333
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 24.5%24.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.6%11.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos