Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These C. Jarrett Dieterle results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 745 hits . Analysis detected 6,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,931 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This C. Jarrett Dieterle is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. C. Jarrett Dieterle
Author details
Total words: 4,931
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst