Keyword summary
76% 62 analyzed articles/videos 36,560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tehran results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 20,390 hits . Analysis detected 161,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 175,321 analyzed words across 62 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (29,517 of 34,370 keywords). This Tehran is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Tehran
Keyword details
Total words: 175,321
Article count: 62
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score62 analyzed articles175.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst