Author summary
84% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuti Mishra results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,820 hits . Analysis detected 11,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,013 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,295 of 6,204 authors). This Stuti Mishra is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Stuti Mishra
Author details
Total words: 11,013
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.5% 16.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst