Author summary
79% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Wootton-Cane results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,502 hits . Analysis detected 11,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,024 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,674 of 6,351 authors). This Nicole Wootton-Cane is worse (more manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Nicole Wootton-Cane
Author details
Total words: 9,024
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst