Author summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arpan Rai results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 660 hits . Analysis detected 2,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,839 of 6,171 authors). This Arpan Rai is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. Arpan Rai
Author details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.3% 18.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst