Author summary
58%2 analyzed articles/videos1,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Dalton results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 883 hits. Analysis detected 5,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,193 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,553 of 6,244 authors). This Jane Dalton is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Jane Dalton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
60%Jane Dalton (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,193
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.5%12.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.9%1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate