Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alisha Rahaman Sarkar results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,622 hits . Analysis detected 12,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,216 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,102 of 6,246 authors). This Alisha Rahaman Sarkar is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. Alisha Rahaman Sarkar
Author details
Total words: 14,216
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst