Topic summary
63% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Betting results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 2,012 hits . Analysis detected 22,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,879 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (11,658 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Betting is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Sports Betting
Topic details
Total words: 20,879
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score11 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst