Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Troy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,186 hits . Analysis detected 8,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,786 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,821 of 6,628 authors). This David Troy is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. David Troy
Author details
Total words: 5,786
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.5% 20.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.0% 8.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.0% Special Pleading: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst