Topic summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Affairs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 736 hits . Analysis detected 4,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,604 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,815 of 15,785 topics). This Social Affairs is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group. Social Affairs
Topic details
Total words: 2,604
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.4% 21.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst