Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Kaori Gurley results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 507 hits . Analysis detected 2,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,610 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 88% (858 of 6,628 authors). This Lauren Kaori Gurley is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Lauren Kaori Gurley
Author details
Total words: 1,610
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.1% percentile 5.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 29.8% 29.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 31.5% 31.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 31.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 29.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst