Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Duncan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 2,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,128 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (381 of 6,628 authors). This Ian Duncan is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Ian Duncan
Author details
Total words: 1,128
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.3% percentile 9.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 28.6% 28.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 22.1% 22.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.8% 22.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 23.9% 23.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 37.7% 37.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.8% 16.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.3% 26.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 37.7%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 28.6%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Author 26.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 23.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.8%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 22.1%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst