Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nitasha Tiku results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 221 hits . Analysis detected 1,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (213 of 6,628 authors). This Nitasha Tiku is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Nitasha Tiku
Author details
Total words: 488
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.8% percentile 13.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles488 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 33.6% 33.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 29.5% 29.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 45.3% 45.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 36.3% 36.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 22.5% 22.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.9% 18.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 45.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 36.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 29.5%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 22.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst