Topic summary
43% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,372 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Snap results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 3,309 hits . Analysis detected 31,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,792 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (13,786 of 15,142 topics). This Snap is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Snap
Topic details
Total words: 39,792
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles39.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst