Author summary
72%5 analyzed articles/videos3,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Carpenter results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 2,029 hits. Analysis detected 14,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,965 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,143 of 6,270 authors). This Tim Carpenter is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Tim Carpenter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
34%Tim Carpenter (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,965
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate