Kansas lawmakers didn't give court employees a raise this year. So the chief justice did it instead 

By Tim Carpenter72%

5/17/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: The article has not yet been analyzed.

TOPEKA  Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Rosen says internal budget reallocation allows for a 1% salary increase among nonjudicial employees to match raises granted by the Legislature for state employees in the executive branch. 
The Legislature adjourned the 2026 session without appropriating money to elevate salaries of the state’s 2,000 judicial branch employees. 
At the end of the annual session, the Legislature did vote to finance the across-the-board salary enhancement for executive branch staff. 
Each House and Senate member also received an automatic 4.4% boost in compensation, while lawmakers agreed to provide other legislative branch employees a generous 10% raise. 
Rosen sent a letter Thursday on behalf of the state Supreme Court that informed court clerks, court reporters, bailiffs and other courthouse staff of their 1% raise effective July 1. 
“We recognize that the 1% increase is less than what was originally proposed for our fiscal year 2027 budget request, but we believe it is important to recognize and thank the employees who make our justice system possible in communities across Kansas,” Rosen wrote in the letter. 
“Your work ensures Kansans have access to essential court services and to the fair administration of justice.” 
The Supreme Court and the Kansas Office of Judicial Administration had been discussing for about a month what might be possible in terms of providing raises through existing resources. 
The plan excluded justices or judges from the pay bump. 
Rosen and other judges had expressed concern the lack of raises in 2026 could prompt valued employees to leave state government for jobs in the private sector. 
There was apprehension about the ability of judicial branch employees to absorb ongoing inflation in the cost of living. 
In January, Gov. 
Laura Kelly had recommended the Legislature authorize 2.5% raises for state government employees. 
To demonstrate irritation at the Legislature’s rejection of her proposal, the governor subsequently vetoed the entire budget for the legislative branch. 
Both the Senate and House voted with two-thirds majorities to override her. 
The automatic 4.4% raise in 2026 for the state’s 165 legislators was tied to an index based on increases in Kansas wages. 
The index makes it possible for legislators to receive annual raises without the Legislature voting on those changes in compensation. 
This story was first published by the Kansas Reflector. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%Tim Carpenter: 2.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Tim Carpenter: 9.5%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.5%Tim Carpenter: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Tim Carpenter: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias6.8%This article: 12.1%Tim Carpenter: 8.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias12.1%This article: 11.8%Tim Carpenter: 4.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias11.8%This article: 5.3%Tim Carpenter: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Tim Carpenter: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority9.0%This article: 1.8%Tim Carpenter: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma1.8%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 4.9%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.1%Tim Carpenter: 13.6%Columbia Missourian: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion16.1%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 3.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 2.6%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.5%Tim Carpenter: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.5%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 2.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 3.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tim Carpenter: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

398 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers52%attributed speech190writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageEric Rosen • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageEric Rosen • 30 words • 0.0% coverageEric Rosen • 47 words • 0.0% coverageEric Rosen • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKansas Office of Judicial Administration • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageEric Rosen • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLaura Kelly • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKansas Reflector • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eric Rosen

81%flagged-word coverage
157 attributed words75% of attributed speech59% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.