Author summary
33% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,216 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hope Kirwan results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 431 hits . Analysis detected 4,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,434 of 6,194 authors). This Hope Kirwan is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Hope Kirwan
Author details
Total words: 7,264
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst