Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Pope results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,623 hits . Analysis detected 8,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,850 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,790 of 6,226 authors). This Anna Pope is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Anna Pope
Author details
Total words: 6,850
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 23.6% 23.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.7% 23.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 23.6%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst