Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Cramer results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 411 hits . Analysis detected 3,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,645 of 6,498 authors). This Rachel Cramer is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Rachel Cramer
Author details
Total words: 3,580
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst