Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryce Covert results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,933 hits. Analysis detected 12,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,577 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,183 of 6,268 authors). This Bryce Covert is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Bryce Covert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
18%Bryce Covert (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,577
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate