Topic summary
51% 15 analyzed articles/videos 13,108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Art results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 3,477 hits . Analysis detected 33,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,724 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (15,315 of 15,612 topics). This Public Art is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Public Art
Topic details
Total words: 58,724
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score15 analyzed articles58.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst