Author summary
24%5 analyzed articles/videos854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Molly DeVore results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 646 hits. Analysis detected 5,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,979 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,403 of 6,357 authors). This Molly DeVore is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Molly DeVore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
15%Molly DeVore (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,979
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate