Author summary
4%2 analyzed articles/videos2,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather J. Chin results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 2,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,991 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,602 of 6,195 authors). This Heather J. Chin is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Heather J. Chin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
10%Heather J. Chin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,991
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

10% percentile
02550751009.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos