Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Hotchkiss results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 822 hits . Analysis detected 4,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,358 of 6,360 authors). This Sarah Hotchkiss is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Sarah Hotchkiss
Author details
Total words: 7,792
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst