Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These CatchLight Local results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 808 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,346 authors). This CatchLight Local is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
CatchLight Local
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%CatchLight Local (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos