Topic summary
36% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Protests And Demonstrations results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 2,162 hits . Analysis detected 18,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,089 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,517 of 15,326 topics). This Protests And Demonstrations is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Protests And Demonstrations
Topic details
Total words: 25,089
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst